A Binding Financial Agreement (BFA) is designed to provide certainty and security in financial matters, helping couples plan for the future with clarity and confidence. The BFA outlines the division of assets and liabilities in the event of separation. This document can be made at any time, including before entering into a marriage or de facto relationship, during, or after it ends whether through divorce or separation.
But the issue does arise, what happens if one party refuses to abide by a binding financial agreement?
Navigating the enforcement of a BFA can be confusing due to the legal challenges involved. So having a clear understanding of the legal framework is essential to ensure compliance and best protect each party's financial interests
A BFA provides strict guidelines by outlining financial responsibilities and protecting individuals from contentious legal battles in the event of separation.
This agreement is governed by Sections 90B-90G of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) for married couples and Sections 90UA-90UN for de facto relationships, which sets out the statutory requirements to ensure the document's validity and enforceability.
If clear guidelines aren’t established, these disagreements could lead to lengthy and costly legal battles in the future. As such, having this agreement can provide certainty and protect both parties from potential disputes down the line.
If these criteria are not met, the courts can state that the document is not enforceable. In addition to this, if there is a significant change in circumstances, the Court may also see fit to set aside the agreement
Under Section 90K(1)(d) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), a Court may set aside the agreement if an unforeseen event causes undue hardship. Examples include:
In the case of these events, a Court may reconsider the fairness of the agreement and make moves to amend it.
Case law precedent: In Thorne v Kennedy (2017), the High Court of Australia set aside a BFA due to procedural unfairness and significant power imbalance between the husband and wife, reaffirming the principle that agreements must be just and equitable at the time of enforcement.
In the event of a dispute, it is important to know the rights and obligations when trying to enforce the agreement.
Before taking legal action, using direct communication or a professional mediation service may be the best course of action. In some cases, misunderstandings or temporary financial difficulties may underlay the reasons for non-compliance and a simple mediated conversation can often lead to a resolution without involving the Courts.
If this does not work, it may be recommended to apply to the Family Court or Federal Circuit Court to enforce the agreement. They will then examine the validity of the document and may issue orders to ensure compliance.
This course of action can result in various Court orders:
A Binding Financial Agreement is an essential tool for safeguarding financial interests in a relationship. However, its enforceability depends on strict compliance with legal requirements and good faith execution by both parties.
To prevent any disputes,
Ensuring that a Binding Financial Agreement is legally compliant and enforceable requires expert legal guidance. If the statutory requirements aren’t met, it may result in the document being challenged or set aside, potentially leading to costly litigation.
At Hillcrest Family Lawyers, we specialise in drafting, reviewing, and enforcing Binding Financial Agreements in accordance with Australian Family Law legislation and judicial precedents. Contact us today for legal advice to safeguard your financial interest.